Sodastream Slim Sparkling Water Bottle Twin Pack White 16.9 oz
You Saved $5.00
SodaStream Carbonating Bottles bring the fizz and keep it fresh and bubbly for up to 2 weeks! They are the perfect personal size for on-the-go.
One SodaStream reusable carbonating bottle can save up to thousands of single use plastic bottles.
Always fizz water before adding any flavor.
check out our best sellers
reviews
56 customer reviews
Very handy at home.
Unusable in less than 2 months
We bought 8 of these bottles on May 23. The bottom white plastic section has fallen off 4 of them in just 2 months. Expensive plastic bottles that didn’t last. Very disappointed in the quality!
Ask for Expiration Date on Bottles Before Buying
I bought some of these 16. 9 oz. bottles in April 2026. When I washed them prior to use, I discovered that they had an expiration date of October 2026. That's just 6 months when all the other bottles I've ever gotten from SodaStream have a 36 month life. When I contacted SodaStream, they did not apologize for selling a product with over 80% of its shelf life already gone. They just said that I could contact them closer to the expiration date they would send me new ones. Why should customers suffer this kind of inconvenience for something that SodaStream should not have done in the first place? I chose to get a refund. SodaStream cannot expect to win and keep customers with this kind of behavior.
Buyer Beware
I'm a first time soda stream user, and am excited about the reusability of the bottles. No where in the marketing descriptions of the plastic bottles do they tell you that the bottles have an expiration date. I purchased the bottles on sale, and now I know why. There are only 4 months left on the shelf life before the bottles are 'too dangerous' to use in the machine. Really? If you're marking items on clearance due to shelf life - you should clearly describe why so the consumer knows what they are buying.
From Five Stars to “You’ve Got to Be Kidding Me"
I'm a fairly new SodaStream customer who genuinely loved the product. ; using it daily, recommending it, and assuming the basics of any reputable company were a given. Here's the short start to finish reality check I was served up. I ordered the two pack half‑liter bottles at the end of April. This experience represents a complete failure of product lifecycle and supply chain management. I was shipped an item that is already at the end of its shelf life, despite it being intended for multi-year use. To make matters worse, customer support completely collapsed by refusing to acknowledge that this expired inventory should never have left the warehouse and failed to provide a basic replacement to resolve the issue. Recently while washing them, I was shocked when I noticed they expire this fall. Brand new bottles with only a few months of usable life (for carbonating purposes). Here I am thinking this is simple, standard, automatic. Any company would say, “Of course. That shouldn’t have happened, we’ll send replacements immediately. ” Correct? Yeah… no. My Chatbot experience was OK but could only confirm the product use after life: "I can confirm is that plastic carbonating bottles shouldn’t be used past the expiry date printed on the bottle. After that date, they can still be used to hold still beverages, but not for carbonation. " Followed by live customer support advising with a conflict to the expiration date and usage: "seeing an expiration date of October does not necessarily mean that you cannot use it to carbonate after that date. However, if the bottle gives you issues around October, kindly inform us and provide proof of purchase. We will arrange a replacement for you. Since sending a replacement now may result in receiving bottles from the same batch" I actually sat there staring at the screen like dip was literally dripping down my face. Why is the onus being put on me, the customer? I couldn’t believe I was reading an official response from a real company. I felt like my jaw fully dropped into the metaphorical five‑layer dip. In under 30 seconds, I went from a five‑star fan to wondering how something this basic could unravel so fast. I expected a simple, responsible resolution. Instead, I was told to live with a product that should never have been shipped in the first place. I let the agent reiterate the shocking reality that basically resonated to me, that he acknowledges this was inconvenient, his words. This is not good management of a product's lifecycle intended use, and my brand-trust is now in question, going from five stars to me thinking "You’ve got to be kidding me!"